Abie Philbin Bowman on the General Election
I haven't got a party political bone in my
body. I have always been drawn to, or turned off by, individuals based on their
ideas, values and talents.
That's how I decide who gets my vote.
If I'd been old enough, I would have voted
for Garret FitzGerald over Charlie Haughey in the 1980s, and John Bruton over
Albert Reynolds in the early 90s. Not for any party political reasons, but
simply because Fitzgerald and Bruton were better leaders, with clearer ideas and
greater talents.
There is no doubt in my mind that Bertie
Ahern is a better Taoiseach than Enda Kenny could ever be.
Much has been written about Bertie's financial
dealings in the early 1990s. I've heard many people say that no other Western
democracy would tolerate such lax standards from their head of government.
Has anyone been following world events
recently?
In Bertie's time as Taoiseach, consider
some of the people who have been running the most powerful nations in the world:
Jacques Chirac, a crook
Silvio Berlusconi, a crook and a
megalomaniac
Vladimir Putin, an ex-KGB agent who is
trying to bring back the good old days
George Bush and Tony Blair, two war
mongers
Of course this doesn't excuse low-level
corruption. But the bottom line is that when I look at Bertie Ahern, I do not
see a man driven by the pursuit of personal wealth. I do see someone who has
shown remarkable leadership over the last 10 years.
I don't dispute that there are serious
problems in this country, but I see very few people in the two main opposition
parties who I think are capable of sorting them out.
If I could choose a dream cabinet it would
include: John
Gormley (Greens), Eamon Ryan (Greens), Richard Bruton (FG), Brian Hayes
(FG), Ruairi Quinn (Labour), Brendan Howlin (Labour), Bertie Ahern
(FF), Brian Cowen (FF), Micheal Martin (FF), Dermot Ahern (FF), Brian
Lenihan (FF), Mary Hannifin (FF), Michael McDowell (PDs), Liz O'Donnell
(PDs), Mary Harney (PDs) – although not as
Minister for Health.
And Enda Kenny's speechwriter.
The health services in this country are an
intractable mess. I admire Mary Harney for taking on the job, and – other things
being equal – I think it's a good idea to have a health minister from a small
party, who doesn't have party colleagues in every constituency, fighting to
protect local agendas ahead of a national strategy. I think Mary Harney has a
great record at trade and industry.
The problem is that the PDs philosophy of
free enterprise may be a great way to reform taxi services, but the profit
motive is not suited to the State provision of primary health care.
Michael McDowell has come in for a lot of
personal criticism. I think that plays right into his hands. He is using the
same cynical formula that has served him so well in the past. If the PDs are
centre stage, they can't lose. Even if 80% of the electorate are turned off by
McDowell's aggressive tactics, that's still a victory. Because their base level
of support is 2%. If they can dominate the news agenda, they're bound to win
over some new fraction of the electorate, however many people they alienate in
the process.
That was not interesting at all. Dreadfully boring.
Posted by: Gary | May 20, 2007 at 16:02