Max McGuinness will not miss the PDs.
It
would be no bad thing if this country had a genuinely liberal party – a party prepared
to advocate an expanded role for personal freedom in all areas, founded on the
principles of John Stuart Mill and Friedrich
von Hayek. Such a party would argue for
lower taxes and freer immigration,
privatisation and gay marriage, a
smaller public sector and legalised
abortion, the elimination of subsidies and
the decriminalisation of drugs. I probably wouldn’t vote for it but such a
party would have the potential to make a marginal yet valuable contribution to
Irish politics. Examples in continental Europe include the German FDP and Dutch
VVD.
The
Progressive Democrats were never such a party. Despite their membership of the
Liberal International, they never seriously campaigned for liberal social
reforms and latterly pursued an anti-liberal agenda with 2004’s citizenship referendum.
The PDs were also in the tank for Fianna Fáil during the last abortion
referendum, which, if passed, would have sent doctors performing abortions to
jail for up to 12 years.
Their
commitment to economic liberalism was pretty inconsistent as well. Yes to lower
taxes but yes to clientilist vote-buying too via the fiasco of de-centralisation
which Tom Parlon notoriously “delivered”. Throughout their eleven years in
government since 1997, the party never once tried to restrain Fianna Fáil from
bribing the electorate with the give-away budgets which have left us in an
economically perilous state.
The
PDs’ role in creating the Celtic Tiger has been similarly exaggerated. While I personally
do not accept that cutting thousands of hospitals was ever good policy, if
anyone deserves credit for fiscal rectitude it is former Fine Gael leader Alan
Dukes, who enabled reductions in public spending through the “Tallaght Strategy”
of support for a minority Fianna Fáil government in 1987.
The
party’s real raison d’être was Dessie
O’Malley’s hatred of Charlie Haughey. That has long since been irrelevant yet with under four percent of the vote, the PDs have exerted a major
influence over policy for a decade and they will continue to do so through
Mary Harney’s inequitable policy of hospital co-location. Consequently, a divisive
figure like Michael McDowell who would have been a star backbench gadfly (which
I mean as a compliment) in any other country was able to become Tánaiste. He
did one great service in facing down IRA criminality when Bertie and Blair were
prepared to look the other way.
Otherwise,
the PDs have long since been an overrated anomaly and shall not be missed.
So many of the problems of the world - including the recent mayhem in Mumbai - are the result of the Rapacious Avarice - either real or imagined [frequently with good reason.] When will Avarice be considered as a Societal Evil? And when will the ostentacious displays of wealth be perceived as repulsive?
Posted by: John C. Begley | November 29, 2008 at 17:40